ARMY SHOULD NOT BE DOWN GRADED..ITS ASSERTION
IS
NOT INTEREFRENCE
Dr K Prabhakar
Rao
In a recent article in Enadu (
Telugu) Kuldip Nayar former Indian High commissioner to UK was very critical about army and in no uncertain terms he said that armys
intereference in civil administration
has been increasing. He saw threat to Indian democracy due to such rise.This is not first time that civilian beaurocrats in I India have been
critical of army and in fcat the relations between Indian beaurocrats and army
have always been unsatisfactory.This is
due to many reasons.
In
fact, Jawaharlal Nehru the first PM of India
was scared of army. He was very much apprehensive of General Thimmayya
who commanded great respect in all services. Before Chinese war in 1962, The army chief General Thimmayya and Defence
minister VK Krishna menon had serious differences and General Thimmayya
submitted resignation. However General Thiimmayya was much persuaded by Nehru
and he withdrew his resignation. Later, the PM let the General down in parliament
badly and soon Thimmayya retired. The war against China was a serious catastrophe and India received grave shock
and VK Krishna Menon was sacked later. In fact, Nehru should have resigned
taking responsibility as it was a civilian failure and not an army failure. But
Nehru continued in chair, People say he died of sorrow and shock in 1964 which
is of course debatable. Armys prestige
nose dived. It was only after 1965 and 1971 that army regained its prestige and confidence to some extent. Nehru’s govt
made sure that all service chiefs are of same rank so that they could never
unite for military coup. The word commander in chief that was earlier present
was taken off. Thus army was cut to size as first step. Next step was down
gradation of army ranks in protocol. The ranks were seriously down graded in
comparison to political leaders and IAS babus. With this started the eternal
and never ending squabble between army
and civilian babus. Army is under MOD
and all its matters have to be processed through MOD that is dominated by
civilian Babus. In a democracy army has to take back seat and civilian
authority is supreme and this fact no one denies including army.
Mr
Nayar in his article was critical that the special powers granted to army in Ja
nd K state and in Eastern troubles states such as Nagaland have to be removed. In fcat the young chif miniser of J and K recommended
to the govt that army's powers be removed in his staete. Mr Nayar lamented
that army resisted the move and the govt
was helpless. This he saw as armys influence over civilain authority. Secondly
the recent encounter in Kashmir in which
some youth were killed was quoted. Kashmiris claim that these youths were
innocent . The aspect of siachin glacier also became a matter of discussion. It
has been claimed that the foreign ministers of
India and Paksitan agreed to withdrwan troops from Siachin. Mr Nayar also claimed that the retired senior military officers opined that these areas need not be held as
there was no purpose. However he lamented that army insisted on occupying
siachin lands. This matter has been again seen as interference in civil administration. Is Mr Nayar competent to decide and discuss the strategic
issues of defense. After all he is a mere beaurocrat of some repute. But that does not make him all knowing
type. In India withdrew from Siachin pak
would surely occupy these lands and will
notr honor the commitmnets. Pakistan
always betrayed us. Similarly Kashmir can not be held with army;s hands tied
behind. Jihadis would butcher army
while guys like Kuldip nayar would watching TV in his cozy house. The kashmir valley has been
islamised. They have driven away pandits from the valley. Pakistan is in hand
in glove with separatists and making all attempts to infiltrate into state.
This is being stopped only by presence
of army. Army knows what is best for the valley to stop infiltration and not
nayar. It is better Mr Nayar relaxes after retirement instead of creating
confusion and degrading army;s stature
and demoralize them. He is a chip of old dead wood.
5 comments:
When wood is rotten it has to be burnt off
General VK Singh ( Retired) former COAS was elected as MP in recent polls from BJP and is now the minister of state with independent charge for affairs of Eastern India and development and some connected issues, He was not given cabinet rank. If a person of COAS level is given alower post ofministerof state one can imagine whta can be expected by army in India from the govt.He was treated shabbily by Congress govt while in uniform.Of course he won on BJP ticket and not by his name or popularity,Better he does not accept it and work as simple MP. That is more honorable.
General VK Singh ( Retired) former COAS was elected as MP in recent polls from BJP and is now the minister of state with independent charge for affairs of Eastern India and development and some connected issues, He was not given cabinet rank. If a person of COAS level is given alower post ofministerof state one can imagine whta can be expected by army in India from the govt.He was treated shabbily by Congress govt while in uniform.Of course he won on BJP ticket and not by his name or popularity,Better he does not accept it and work as simple MP. That is more honorable.
When wood is rotten some times it can be wet too and it will not burn easily. Therefore enough kerosene should be poured over it so that it burns off. Some one should ensure that it burns off completely by pouring kerosene few more times.
Post a Comment