ISLAMIC RULERS IN INDIA NEED NO GLORIFICATION… THEY WERE FUNDAMENTALITS, SADISTS AND TEMPLE DESTROYERS TO THE CORE

 ISLAMIC  RULERS IN INDIA NEED NO GLORIFICATION… THEY WERE FUNDAMENTALITS, SADISTS AND TEMPLE DESTROYERS TO THE CORE

                                                   PART V

                                           Dr K Prabhakar Rao

5. SEX MANIACS AND SLAVES OF SEX

                      The Muslim sultans  right from the period of Slave sultanate starting from Kutubuddin Aibek to the end of Mulsim rule  practiced  abominal sex. Many of them were perverted and practiced homosexuality with slaves and castrated men and boys. This topic is very much debatable as ancient Hindu temple sculptures at Khajuraho and Konark speak about Hindu society in this perspective. These sculptures depict various sex acts and positions and is open to public glare.In some of the temples sculptures depict sex acts with animals too. Many scholars have written on these sculptures and the necessity of such creations. In ancient India, probably sex was openly discussed and over the passage of time it has become a taboo to discuss  these topics in India.Todays youth learn about it from cheap literature and friends, porn and  ill conceived sources like internet . The ancient book on Kamasutra by Vatsayana gives details of the sex science and this book has been translated into world languages. The author of the book saw the acts not only for procreation  but also for deriving of bodily pleasure. Indian Hindu kings  also  married several wives and had harems. They also had concubines.  Marrying several wives was practiced mostly for having more sons so that the dynasty flourished. Wars were very common and there were deaths too in these wars. Probably there was no Hindu king after Lord Sri Rama of Ayodhya who  had only one wife. Hindu kings were not free from the vice of maintaining concubines. Illustrious emperor Krishna deva Raya also had many concubines apart from three queens. VijayaRaghava  naika of  Tanjavur kingdom had large harem  and he openly demonstrated his   flirting with women  in open court. Thus  we can note that womanizing was common in most of the world societies and  Hindu kings  were no exceptions. A finger is also pointed towards a  queen of Madura  during Naika reign who ruled the kingdom as a regent. She  was reportedly indulged in  immoral activities with many men of the  court.  Men were equally involved. Plural marriages in Hindu society stopped only after promulgating of Sharda act in modern times. It was very common practice in Hindus society to have more wives  before India got independence in 1947.Therefore Muslims  can not be singled out on this front. However Holy  Qoran is very specific on the aspect of sex with slaves and captured women after a war. Hindu  scriptures are free from such specific  instructions.

  We see that Muslim invaders and sultans were practicing abduction of captured women and took them as slaves after  winning every battle. In most of the cases men were put to sword. The women were raped too as a right. A great controversy exists on the aspect of rape of captured women by Muslims as a policy and as a sanctioned act. In this connection following are relevant and quoted by the scholars .
Surah 4:24. “Also forbidden for you are married women except those who have fallen into your hands as Prisoners of war?
“ And all married women ( are forbidden unto you) save those ( captives who your right hand possess ( It is a degree of Allah for you )

 
                Obviously the women who became captives during invasions and battles the men having been vanquished, become the property of the victor or capturer. Their husbands may be alive, yet she becomes a trophy of war. Their marriages automatically get annulled once she is captured. She becomes a slave. The moment she becomes a captive she becomes the PW. These revelations are enough for the victors who practiced the evil acts of rape on captured women. In view of the above, Muslim armies resorted to the evil practice in all their campaigns.sex with slaves became ramapant in  their society as the provisions in scripture were taken as divine approval. Right from the days of Mohd Bin Kasim to the evil Razakar times Kasim Razvi of 1948 in Hyderabad the evil practice was predominant whenever Hindus were subjugated by war and violent acts. These   actions were unheard during the wars between Hindu kings or between a Hindu king and Muslim sultan  in which Muslims were defeated. Wars between Hindu kings followed a code of conduct in which women , children, bikhshukhs and  Brahmins were not touched. Villages were not attacked. Cows and cattle were not killed. Farms were not plundered. Muslim sultans who approved such acts and practiced them can not be clean persons and   surely  do not need glorification. .  Aliya Rama raya defacto emperor of Vijay nagar empire was blamed for certain acts by his victorious army against the Muslim population after his conquest of Ahmednagar against Hussein Nizamshah in 16 century.  Hussein Nizam shah bore a personal grudge against him and he killed Rama Raya  instantly after his capture in Tallikota Battle in 1565. However  these allegations have no  evidence and are based on  writings of Muslim historians who were surely biased against a victorious Hindu king.

                   There are no cases of forced marriages after a victory between Hindu kings. If at all  such marriages took place, it was with mutual consent and as per some treaty. Sri Krishna Deva Raya of vijay nagar empire defeated Prataparudra Gajapathi of kalinga kingdom in 16 century and as per treaty terms he married Tukkamba  the daughter of Gajapathi. As per legend, the vanquished King forced her daughter to kill Krishna deva Raya on the first night. However she preferred to commit suicide instead of killing her husband and she was saved by Krishna Deva and his minister Appaji.    The subsequent married life of  the princess and Krihna deva Raya  is not documented and it is believed that she lived mostly separately away from the king due to strained relations.  However Muslim sultans converted captured royal women to Islam and married. On most of the occasions they were raped and made concubines. Rani Karnavathi of Gujarat was captured after defeating her husband by Allauddin Khilji and he married her. Allaunddin Khilji was also after Rani Padmini wife of Rana Bhim singh. She was the most beautiful woman of the times. The story is well known. Rani Padmini committed jauhar when her capture was imminent. Emperor Akbar much glorified by our pseudo historians  was no saint. He had a very large harem where more than 5000 women stayed. Akbar married the young wife of his mentor Bairam khan the moment he was killed  while on his way to Mecca. He did not waste any time. Where was the urgency? Many Rajput kings gave their daughters or sisters in marriage to Mughals to save their skin  and kingdoms. In turn, there were given high positions in the court and were allowed to retain their kingdoms and titles. Raja Man Singh brother of queen Jodha bai was made the commander in chief of Mughal army. These women had to accept Islam. However there were some Rajput kings who hated the practice of giving their women to Mughals in marriage and loathed the idea. Maha Rana Pratap singh of Chitthor was one among them. He fought tooth and nail  throughout his life against Mughals but did not let go his honor. After Prataps death most of the Rajputs were leadersless and fell in line. However Durga das Thakur raised a banner of revolt against Aurangzeb after the death of Raja Jaswant singh in war front due to illness on western borders leaving infant sons who were born after his death. Aurangzeb could not win against these Rajputs and died in 1707.  His succeesor Bahadur shah I accepted the  Rajput prince as the successor to Raja Jaswant singh. Mughal supremacy declined rapidly with puppets sitting on the throne. Rajput kingdoms soon flourished. After the battle of Plassey in 1757,  English men gained power and Mughals   were reduced to pittance.

           The most important aspect in Muslim rule is the craving and practice of sex with eunuchs and slaves  by the sultans and others. Nothing can be more averse than the acts of Mubarak Khilji the successor of Allauddinn khilji. He was the most perverted and unworthy of his position as a sovereign. He indulged openly in these acts along with his nobles and courtiers. These have been recorded by the contemporary historians. He dressed as an eunuch and entered the court where he gave dirty and filthy glances at others and danced invitingly.  He used to open and throw out his clothes and dance in nakedness and what followed used to be the most filthier un natural  sexual acts   openly practiced.      What an utter shame indeed and it is a shame that Indian history has been glorifying these sultans as great  administrators and men of caliber!. The   Sultan was  of course  assassinated in few years not before great damage was done to the empire  built by Allauddin Khilji of course based on cruelty, deceipt, tyranny ,  suppression and wars.

                Emperor Shah je jahan reportedly had affairs with his daughter and it was approved by the clergy. How can we glorify such disgusting rulers as great men? Zahandar shah was one of most wretched emperor from the Mughal dynasty who  had many concubines  and he was  much fascinated with one Lal kumari. He threw away to winds all  decency and involved himself in sex acts  and drinking. It was not surprising that he was  killed in a years rule by Farukhsiyar  who became the ruler.The courts of later Mughals became the  place for all types of ill virtued women, prostitues and such women. Senior nobles like Chinkhilij khan left the court disgusted and went to Deccan . He later became Nizam 7 and founder of Asifjhai  dynasty that lasted up to  1948. The last ruler Osmal Ali Khan  the  Nizam 7 also had many  wives and concubines. 

                We do not  hear such disgusting  acts taking place in Hindu kingdoms.  Even if one practiced  sodomy or sex with eunuchs it was behind closed doors as it was  looked down in society. Treatise  of Kamsutra surely indicates that such practices were existing in Hindu society. Even today some  perverted  Hindu men get involved with eunuchs in  darkness of  night and it is seen as  part of game. On the whole Muslim rulers freely engaged themselves in sexual activities not only with wives, concubines, but also with Eunuchs,Castrated young boys and slaves.  Thus these rulers need no glorification by our historians